Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

AI Act Article 50 transparency in practice

A decision path for human interaction notices, synthetic-content marking, deepfakes, emotion recognition, and public-interest text.

Written and reviewed by Fredrik Surtell ·

Which AI outputs require transparency under Article 50?

The answer depends on who provides or deploys the system and the use: direct interaction, synthetic content, emotion or biometric categorisation, deepfakes, and AI-generated public-interest text have distinct duties and exceptions.

Operating sequence

  1. 01

    Classify the interaction and content types each AI feature can produce.

  2. 02

    Place disclosure where people encounter the system or content, in an accessible and timely form.

  3. 03

    Preserve machine-readable marking where required and document editorial or legal exceptions.

Failure modes to avoid

  • Using one generic “powered by AI” notice for every duty.
  • Removing provider markings during downstream publication.
  • Assuming human review always removes the public-interest disclosure duty without checking the rule.

The source remains the authority.

European Commission — Article 50 transparency Q&A